- pg 11: It may be argued that a destructive act such breaking a window is economically beneficial as the victim now must pay someone else to fix it, creating jobs to fix the issue, increasing employment, etc.
- pg 12: The point falls, as it neglects to account for the money lost by the victim. The victim will have less money to spend on other things, meaning less jobs created in these other areas. No new employment was added overall, it was merely shifted.